Your Gold Has Never Paid You A Dime

A note from our friends at Decentralized Masters(ad)

Dear Reader,

Physical gold has NEVER paid a dividend…

…NEVER generated income…

Its price can rise. But it has never paid you just for holding it.

Tokenized gold can change that. It’s real, vaulted gold that you own as a digital token.

Think of it like real estate.

You already own the house. Instead of letting it sit empty, you rent it out… and collect rent while you still own it.

With tokenized gold, you can deposit your tokens into a shared pool that other investors use to swap between gold and dollars.

Every time someone swaps, they pay a small fee. And a share of every fee goes to you.

The more people trading… the more fees you can collect.

Now, I’ll be straight with you. Those fees rise and fall. And if gold’s price moves a lot, the pool rebalances… so you may end up with less gold and more dollars than you started with.

That’s the trade-off. But for 5,000 years, gold never even gave you the option.

In my free video, I walk you through a real, live pool.

See how your gold can earn →

To your wealth,

Alex Grandwileski
Decentralized Masters

P.S. Gold has never paid you to hold it. See how tokenized gold can earn while you hold it →

 
 
 
Bonus Article

Nvidia’s Most Crowded Trade Has a New Risk Nobody Priced

Portfolio managers who hold Nvidia as their single largest position woke up Monday to a question they have never had to answer seriously: what is this stock worth without Jensen Huang?

The Nvidia board announced Sunday it is initiating an independent investigation, overseen by a committee of independent directors with outside counsel, after reporting that founder and CEO Jensen Huang has been the target of a foreign intelligence effort. Simultaneously, Huang told Nvidia staff in an email that he had an affair with the woman and that the board had opened an independent investigation into the spying allegations. The board said it has no reason to believe that either national security or Nvidia secrets were compromised, but its inquiry will examine all available information.

The woman at the center of the allegations, Alice Huang, is affiliated with Megaspeed, an Nvidia customer that has faced scrutiny over suspected diversion of Nvidia AI chips to restricted Chinese end users. Three Republican House committee chairs have already asked Huang to appear for a joint closed-door briefing on November 18, 2026. That is one day after earnings. The congressional calendar alone creates an overhang that stretches well past the November 17 print.

The Bull Case: Demand Does Not Care About Governance

Nvidia told CNBC that “today’s news will not slow Nvidia” and that “Jensen is committed to continuing to lead Nvidia as CEO without interruption.” The board’s own statement reinforces that posture, saying Nvidia will continue to be led by Huang and his leadership team. Bulls will note that the AI infrastructure buildout has nothing to do with who signed a personal apology email. Nvidia reported $96.2 billion in revenue for Q2 fiscal 2027, up 106% from a year ago, and analysts estimate Q3 earnings per share of roughly $2.47. The order book does not expire because of a board investigation.

Yorkville Ives’ Dan Ives called this a “black eye” for Huang, while writing that he would expect Huang to continue in his role as CEO with no interruption in the near term.

The Bear Case: Key-Person Risk Was Never in the Price

This is the debate that matters most in investment committee rooms today. Bernstein said that Huang has become Nvidia’s “key person risk,” leading the company’s long-term strategy with roughly 50 to 60 direct reports. The governance structure makes succession genuinely difficult. Nvidia has a management team capable of supporting day-to-day operations, but no publicly identified successor has been clearly positioned as a full replacement for Huang.

Gary Black, managing partner at Future Fund, said bluntly that he doubts Huang will remain in his position and warned that many fund managers will reduce their Nvidia holdings in the coming weeks. Polymarket priced the odds of Huang announcing his resignation or being removed by December 31, 2026 in the mid-teens on Monday. That is not a small number for a company carrying this much institutional weight.

What Investors Are Missing

The market is treating this as a binary Huang-stays or Huang-goes question. The more consequential second-order risk is regulatory, not personnel. The investigation will intensify scrutiny of Nvidia’s compliance and its exposure to chip diversion and export-control enforcement, which remains a key battleground issue in Washington. Huang has been among the most aggressive voices for loosening export restrictions. Any political pressure on that position, regardless of whether he keeps his job, could tighten the policy environment for Nvidia’s China revenue precisely when Washington is watching every move.

Stocks to Watch

NVDA. Shares were down about 4% to 5% in premarket trading Monday. The investigation has an open-ended timeline, the congressional calendar adds pressure through November 18, and Q3 earnings land in between. Every one of those events is a potential volatility trigger in both directions.

AMD. Nvidia’s uncertainty triggered modest gains in some after-hours and derivatives venues, but the public tape on Monday was mixed across the complex. Any sustained reduction in institutional Nvidia exposure benefits the only credible alternative at scale in AI accelerators.

The rotation into AMD is not simply a governance trade. AMD’s data center revenue has already shown it can absorb sector-wide selling pressure that has little to do with its core AI accelerator business.

TSM. TSMC shares in Taiwan rose 4.7% on Monday. The market’s read is that AI chip demand is structural and will clear through Taiwan Semiconductor regardless of who runs Nvidia. That logic holds unless regulatory escalation hits the entire supply chain.

AVGO. Broadcom benefits from the same rotation logic as AMD, and its custom silicon work with hyperscalers gives it independent demand drivers that do not depend on the Nvidia-Jensen identity at all.